Taylor Lorenz’s Power User

The AI industry just had one of its biggest controversies ever.
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz      
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co      
A massive conflict between the Pentagon and leading AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI has triggered a nationwide debate about how artificial intelligence should be used in warfare and surveillance. What started as a $200 million government contract fight quickly spiraled into a Silicon Valley crisis involving autonomous weapons, mass surveillance, and the future of AI regulation.
In this episode of Free Speech Friday, I sit down with The Atlantic's Ross Anderson to uncover the dark truth behind the Pentagon’s push for fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance. We discuss whether AI models like Claude and ChatGPT should be used for military operations, drone targeting, and intelligence analysis. The controversy intensified when Anthropic reportedly pushed back against certain Pentagon requests while OpenAI later reached a separate agreement with the Department of Defense.
We break down exactly how negotiations between Anthropic and the Department of War broke down over using AI to analyze the commercial data of American citizens. From Pete Hegseth going "nuclear" and labeling Anthropic a "supply chain risk", to OpenAI and Sam Altman swooping in at the last minute to claim the government deal, this is the AI drama that broke tech Twitter. Plus, we discuss why Claude experienced a massive subscriber spike while ChatGPT took the military contract.
Topics covered in this video include:
• The Pentagon AI contract controversy 
• OpenAI vs Anthropic drama explained 
• Autonomous weapons and AI warfare 
• AI surveillance concerns 
• Silicon Valley reactions to the deal 
• The future of AI in national security

How Jeffrey Epstein Shaped the Modern Internet: From 4chan to Facebook 
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz     
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co     
Since the release of the Epstein files, we've learned a ton about Epstein's role in the early web. From 4chan to World of Warcraft, to Facebook, and online movements like gamergate and #MeToo, Epstein seems to have played a role in it all. 
So how much of our modern internet was shaped by Epstein? I sat down with Ryan Broderick, author of the Garbage Day newsletter and host of the Panic World podcast,  to uncover how Jeffrey Epstein quietly warped our modern tech landscape.
From his early days scrubbing his SEO to his mysterious networking with Silicon Valley elites, Epstein's rise was intertwined with modern platforms, from MySpace to crypto. 
We discuss: 
How Epstein paid thousands of dollars a month for SEO services and "hacked" Wikipedia to hide his criminal record after his 2008 arrest.
A multi-year editor war over whether Epstein should be included in the notable offender widget on Wikipedia.
He actively explored in-game currencies in World of Warcraft and discussed loot boxes.
Epstein met with 4chan founder "Moot" the day before the infamous /pol/ board was created.
Epstein and Steve Bannon attempted to build a cryptocurrency-funded far-right movement.
The political plot motivated by Epstein's extreme fear of the MeToo movement.
How Epstein infiltrated Silicon Valley, meeting with billionaires like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Mark Zuckerberg.
Epstein's role in Palantir and his bizarre eugenics ideology, hoping to breed young women and create a race of super babies.
How Epstein and his elite peers viewed islands and bunkers as a way to outlast climate change without submitting to government regulation. 
Follow Ryan:
https://garbageday.email 
https://www.youtube.com/@panicworldpod 
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz     
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co     
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz      
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0     
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz 
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social  
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz

How Section 230 Became a Reproductive Rights Issue
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz    
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co    
In this episode of my Section 230 mini series, I break down how anti abortion groups are targeting the internet itself. From the 1873 Comstock Act to modern day efforts to repeal Section 230, there is a long history of using censorship laws to suppress reproductive health information.
 
The fight for reproductive justice and bodily autonomy has always been deeply connected to free speech and open access to information online. I sat down with Sarah Phillips from Fight for the Future to uncover the real, hidden agenda behind the push to repeal Section 230.
While politicians constantly frame weakening Section 230 as a way to "hold Big Tech accountable," these efforts actually undermine our right to access vital information related to reproductive justice and abortion online. We dive deep into the history of speech law, and talk about where the fight stands today. 
Here is what we cover in this episode:
How early internet censorship efforts were disguised as protecting kids from indecent material.

The devastating impact of SESTA/FOSTA and how it led to mass content takedowns of sex education and LGBTQ+ resources.

How the narrative of "tech addiction" is being weaponized to pass restrictive internet laws.

How anti-abortion extremists are targeting Section 230 to take down abortion funds and restrict out-of-state travel for care.

Why protecting Section 230 is vital for shielding secure messaging apps like Signal and Telegram.

Speaking out against Big Tech and challenging institutional power is not lucrative, and these videos are entirely self-funded. If you value this content, please support my work so I can continue making this series!!!
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz    
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co    
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz      
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0     
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz 
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social  
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz

The Trump admin publicly bragged about demanding that Apple and Facebook remove ICE watch apps and Facebook groups documenting ICE activity, and Big Tech is complying.
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz   
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co   
[FREE SPEECH FRIDAY]
Since last year, Meta, Apple, and other big tech platforms have been mass removing content related to ICE. From deleting Facebook groups who criticize ICE agents to removing apps from the app store that allow citizens to report ICE in their neighborhood, it's becoming harder to criticize ICE online. 
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), is suing the government in order to get these Facebook groups and apps restored. Colin McDonnell, an attorney at FIRE joins me to break down these seminal lawsuits, how they're taking on the government, and why it's so crucial to protect free expression online. 
We discuss how DOJ and DHS officials, including Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem, successfully pressured Apple and Facebook to remove an ICE-tracking app and a Chicago-based Facebook group with nearly 100,000 members. Colin breaks down why FIRE is suing the government , whether recording law enforcement in public is protected speech or dangerous "doxing" , and the chilling rumors of a secret ICE protester database
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz     
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0    
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social 
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz

Would you pay $65,000 to have ChatGPT teach your kids?
Support my independent journalism:
🙏 Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/taylorlorenz   
🗞️ Substack: https://www.usermag.co   
404 Media reporter Emmanuel Maiberg joins to discuss the disturbing truth behind Alpha School, an AI-powered private school that has been getting massive hype from mainstream media. While Alpha School promises parents that kids can complete their core education in just two hours a day, leaked internal documents reveal the very chaotic reality behind tech industry buzzwords.
Alpha School charges up to $65,000 a year while openly aiming for a "no human in the loop" model to entirely eliminate human teachers. We discuss how their generative AI systems constantly hallucinate, creating illogical lesson plans and tests that treat kids like tech guinea pigs.
Even more alarming is the massive data harvesting and surveillance. Alpha School utilizes software that monitors students' screens, web cameras, microphones, and mouse movements, acting essentially as boss-ware for children. 
We also expose how video recordings of students have been left unsecured in open Google Drive links and how the school's AI scrapes educational material from platforms like IXL and Albert.io, leading to disabled accounts and terms of service violations. 
Read the 404 Media article: https://www.404media.co/students-are-being-treated-like-guinea-pigs-inside-an-ai-powered-private-school/ 
Follow me:
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz      
https://www.instagram.com/taylorlorenz3.0     
https://www.tiktok.com/@taylorlorenz 
https://bsky.app/profile/taylorlorenz.bsky.social  
https://twitter.com/taylorlorenz