Police Off The Cuff/Real Crime Stories

Why This Stalking Case Turned Deadly | Michael McKee Breakdown  Before the murders of Monique and Spencer Tepe, investigators say there was a clear trail of stalking, threats, and escalating behavior — a trail that began weeks before the killings. In this live police analysis, retired NYPD detectives break down the case against Michael McKee, focusing on the stalking allegations, the arrest affidavit, and the evidence prosecutors say shows premeditation and escalation long before the murders. This livestream examines: The arrest affidavit and formal complaints filed against Michael McKee Reports that McKee entered the area around the Tepe home weeks before the murders The alleged threats made toward Monique Tepe and what they reveal about intent What family members and friends have publicly said about Monique’s fear and state of mind Why stalking cases are among the most dangerous situations law enforcement handles Using a law-enforcement perspective, we explain how investigators identify stalking patterns, why warning signs are often missed, and how these behaviors are presented in court when building a homicide case.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Did the killer scout the Tepe home before the murders?  Did police miss the warning signs that could have stopped this tragedy? Newly revealed evidence paints a disturbing picture of stalking, escalation, and premeditation in the brutal murders of Spencer and Monique Tepe. Court records now show Michael McKee allegedly entered the Tepe home while they were away, raising serious questions about surveillance, obsession, and planning before the killings.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Red Flags That Could Have Stopped The Tepe Murders The Tepe murders were not a mystery — they were a warning. In this livestream, retired NYPD detectives break down the visible danger signs, the domestic-violence escalation, and the hard legal limits that prevented police and family courts from intervening before the killings occurred. This is not hindsight speculation. It is a reality-based analysis of what law enforcement can do, what courts cannot do, and why some cases move toward tragedy despite clear warning signs. We examine the behavioral red flags, the role of protective orders, the disconnect between family court and criminal law, and the moment this case crossed from preventable to legally unstoppable.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this episode of Police Off The Cuff, we break down the growing legal battle surrounding the search of Luigi Mangione’s backpack, a key moment the defense claims violated the Fourth Amendment. At the center of the dispute is the powerful legal doctrine known as “fruits of the poisonous tree” — and whether prosecutors can still use the evidence seized.

From a law-enforcement and courtroom perspective, we analyze:


What police are legally allowed to search — and when


Whether the backpack search crossed constitutional lines


How a motion to suppress evidence could reshape the case


What evidence may survive — and what could be excluded


How this ruling could impact both the state and federal trials

Retired NYPD officers walk through the procedural realities, the defense strategy, and the prosecution’s counterarguments, separating legal myth from courtroom fact. If the judge agrees the search was unlawful, this case could change dramatically — before a jury ever hears the evidence.

This is not speculation. This is real courtroom analysis, real police procedure, and a real-world look at how cases can be won or lost before trial even begins.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Court appearance breakdown: Michael McKee charged with Tepe murders  BREAKING COURTROOM UPDATE Accused killer Michael McKee appeared in court—what happened next could shape the entire murder case involving Spencer and Monique Tepe. In this livestream, retired NYPD detectives break down McKee’s court appearance, the charges he’s facing, his legal representation, and what his early moves signal about a possible defense strategy. We analyze why waiving extradition matters, how prosecutors typically build cases like this, and what evidence may already be locking McKee into a corner.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.