Before Breakfast

Vampires have haunted folklore for centuries — seductive, immortal, and parasitic. But in the modern world, their closest analogs aren’t cloaked in capes or lurking in castles. They wear suits, send texts, and promise opportunity. They are scammers: emotional predators who drain time, trust, and financial lifeblood from their victims. This article reframes scammers through the lens of vampire mythology, offering a survivor-centered analysis of two archetypes — Jemel Moody as the street-level vampire and Michael Tanner as Count Dracula of debt collection.

David Icke frames the Anunnaki as reptilian, fourth-dimensional beings who occupy or “overshadow” human bodies, crossbreed with select bloodlines, drink human blood, and feed on fear and sexual energy. He maps these traits onto classical vampire motifs — eternal life, blood‑drinking, shape‑shifting, and secret societies — and locates the phenomenon inside networks of elite institutions and ritual practice.

Evil is one of the most enduring and provocative concepts in human thought. From religious doctrine to philosophical inquiry, from horror films to political rhetoric, the idea of evil evokes fear, fascination, and moral urgency. But what happens when individuals believe themselves to be evil — or when they see the world strictly divided into good and evil? What are the psychological and social consequences of such binary thinking? And how can humor, often seen as harmless or cathartic, become a weapon in these moral battles?

In forensic pathology the absence of visible bruising or blood pooling does not mean the absence of violence. Torture methods can be deliberately selected to minimize surface discoloration or may leave marks that disappear with time, decomposition, or postmortem handling. Experienced examiners therefore turn to deeper, less obvious evidence: internal injuries, subtle skin changes, histological findings, and the broader investigative context that together can reveal a pattern of inflicted harm.

Money is rarely the whole story, but how someone treats shared finances is one of the clearest, least negotiable signals of care and responsibility. If a partner, family member, or housemate repeatedly avoids paying bills, hides contributions, or expects you to shoulder financial obligations while offering little else in return, that pattern shows where they prioritize — and often, they are not prioritizing you.